One platform. Seven statutes.
Seven regulated professions, each with its own statute, its own vocabulary and its own way of working, all running on one platform that was built once and taught to travel.
— The premise
A regulated profession needs training built around its own statute, not a generic course library with the sector’s name on the cover. Building seven separate platforms is how you end up with seven mediocre ones. So we built one platform, seven statutes, and refused to let any of them be mediocre.
— The engine
What every
product inherits.
Every IQ product inherits the same skeleton. What changes is the legislation it is built around, and the geometry it is drawn with.
-
Curriculum shape
Three pillars, six tiers, twelve tracks, forty‑eight modules: four to a track, at minimum. Every product inherits the skeleton and fills it with its own legislation, often well past it.
- 3 pillars
- 6 tiers
- 12 tracks
- 48+ modules
-
Module shape
Three reading sections with takeaways. One scenario with four options and feedback on every one, including the ones you didn’t choose. Eight questions, each with an explanation.
- Read
- Decide
- Check
-
Progression that means something
Fifty levels, with the curve measured against the actual curriculum so the whole ladder is reachable rather than decorative. Ranks name real jobs, and nothing on a certificate implies a credential somebody else grants.
- 50 levels
- Measured, not guessed
- No invented titles
-
Accessibility, built in
Dark mode, text size, page zoom, high contrast, reduced motion and a reading‑font choice. In the product, not in a backlog. Every contrast ratio was checked against the standard, not chosen by eye.
- High contrast
- Reduced motion
- Reading font
-
Data discipline
A retake never erases your prior record: competency evidence only ever adds to the file, it doesn’t overwrite it. And a broken cross‑reference can’t ship silently: the validator treats a missing check as a blocker, not a warning.
- Records, not overwrites
- Append-only evidence
- Missing data blocks release
— The branches
Where it runs
today.
Each product is the same platform pointed at a different profession. Every one owns a distinct geometry, because a family of recolours would not be a platform.
Raspberry IQ — the mark
-
The Weave — lines
Labour Relations training, rebuilt for how people actually learn, from a first grievance meeting to the bargaining table.
- Grievance to bargaining
- Scenario-driven
- Self-paced
-
Constellation of Care — points
Long-term care training for Ontario operators, built around the realities of actually running a home.
- FLTCA-aligned
- Role-based tracks
- Leadership focus
-
Lit Windows — a residence
Retirement-home training for Ontario operators, built around the Retirement Homes Act, from the resident bill of rights to mandatory reporting.
- Retirement Homes Act
- Three pillars
- Ontario-specific
-
The Flow — traces
Training and decision tools for Ontario’s public hospitals: consent and capacity, patient safety and patient flow.
- Public Hospitals Act
- Consent & capacity
- PHIPA
-
The Ascent — an organization
Decision support across the whole HR discipline, for Ontario professionals.
- Employment standards
- Human rights
- Health & safety
-
The Lattice — cells
The one that spans every sector: practical digital competence for any employee, earned by demonstrating it in simulated workplace labs.
- Twelve tracks
- Simulated labs
- Demonstrated, not attended
-
The Curve — a yield line
Professional education for Canadian financial technology, built around demonstrated competency rather than course completion.
- Competency model
- Jurisdiction-aware
- Dated evidence
— Licensing
Built to be
licensed.
The platform was architected so an organization can run its own academy on it: its own name and mark, its own role pathways over the shared curriculum, its own private material, and its own learner records in storage it owns.
What that should look like commercially is still being worked out, and this page is not going to pretend otherwise. If it is relevant to your organization, a conversation is the useful next step.
Start a conversation— The line we draw
Completion,
not competence.
A development platform and a surveillance platform are built from the same parts. The difference is where you draw the line, and this one is drawn on the learner’s side.
-
An administrator sees completion
Who finished assigned learning, and by when. They do not see individual competency scores. The learner can turn that on, and it is off by default, including inside an organization’s own academy.
-
No surveillance dressed as analytics
No keystroke monitoring, no time‑on‑page tracking, no productivity scoring unrelated to learning. Aggregate reporting (where the gaps are across a team, which material learners are struggling with) is legitimate, and that is what the analytics do.
-
Nothing claims to be a credential
Ranks name real jobs, not titles somebody confers. A level is not a designation, and nothing printed on a certificate claims a credential that wasn’t actually granted.
-
No control over your own data behind a paywall
Data export, account deletion and consent controls are available to everyone. Charging for the ability to leave is not a business model this platform will have.
— Adding a domain
A new domain
is one object.
No new interface to design. No forked application. No duplicated curriculum. A new profession registers as a data object over the shared engine, and everything underneath it (the reader, the assessments, the competency model, the accessibility panel) already works.
That property is the whole argument. It is the difference between a platform and a bespoke build that happens to carry somebody’s logo.
const HOSPITAL_IQ = {
id: 'hosp',
name: 'Hospital IQ',
statute: 'Public Hospitals Act',
signature: 'The Flow',
accent: ['#113a5c', '#d64545'],
pillars: [ /* over the shared curriculum */ ],
};
DOMAINS.push(HOSPITAL_IQ);
Let’s talk.
Whether it is one of the seven or a profession we have not built yet, the conversation starts the same way.